Jump to : Download | Abstract | Keywords | Contact | BibTex reference | EndNote reference |


M. X. Huang, J. J. Shih, R. R. Lee, D. L. Harrington, R. J. Thoma, M. P. Weisend, F. Hanlon, K. M. Paulson, T. Li, K. Martin, G. A. Millers, J. M. Canive. Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr, 16(3):139-158, 2004.


Download paper: (link)

Copyright notice:This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.


A number of beamformers have been introduced to localize neuronal activity using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). However, currently available information about the major aspects of existing beamformers is incomplete. In the present study, detailed analyses are performed to study the commonalities and differences among vectorized versions of existing beamformers in both theory and practice. In addition, a novel beamformer based on higher-order covariance analysis is introduced. Theoretical formulas are provided on all major aspects of each beamformer; to examine their performance, computer simulations with different levels of correlation and signal-to-noise ratio are studied. Then, an empirical data set of human MEG median-nerve responses with a large number of neuronal generators is analyzed using the different beamformers. The results show substantial differences among existing MEG/EEG beamformers in their ways of describing the spatial map of neuronal activity. Differences in performance are observed among existing beamformers in terms of their spatial resolution, false-positive background activity, and robustness to highly correlated signals. Superior performance is obtained using our novel beamformer with higher-order covariance analysis in simulated data. Excellent agreement is also found between the results of our beamformer and the known neurophysiology of the median-nerve MEG response


[ Brain/cytology/*radiation effects ] [ Brain mapping ] [ Comparative study ] [ *electroencephalography ] [ Electromagnetics/methods ] [ Evoked potentials/radiation effects ] [ Human ] [ Image interpretation ] [ Computer-assisted ] [ Least-squares analysis ] [ *magnetoencephalography ] [ Median nerve/physiology/radiation effects ] [ *models ] [ Neurological ] [ Neurons/physiology/radiation effects ] [ Signal processing ] [ Computer-assisted ] [ Support ] [ Non-u.s. gov't ] [ Support ] [ U.s. gov't ] [ Non-p.h.s. ] [ Support ] [ U.s. gov't ] [ P.h.s. ] [ Time factors ]


M. X. Huang
J. J. Shih
R. R. Lee
D. L. Harrington
R. J. Thoma
M. P. Weisend
F. Hanlon
K. M. Paulson
T. Li
K. Martin
G. A. Millers
J. M. Canive

BibTex Reference

   Author = {Huang, M. X. and Shih, J. J. and Lee, R. R. and Harrington, D. L. and Thoma, R. J. and Weisend, M. P. and Hanlon, F. and Paulson, K. M. and Li, T. and Martin, K. and Millers, G. A. and Canive, J. M.},
   Title = {Commonalities and differences among vectorized beamformers in electromagnetic source imaging},
   Journal = {Brain Topogr},
   Volume = {16},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {139--158},
   Year = {2004}

EndNote Reference [help]

Get EndNote Reference (.ref)