Jump to : Download | Abstract | Keywords | Contact | BibTex reference | EndNote reference |

ABH+04

P. Adjamian, G. R. Barnes, A. Hillebrand, I. E. Holliday, K. D. Singh, P. L. Furlong, E. Harrington, C. W. Barclay, P. J. Route. Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching. Clin Neurophysiol, 115(3):691-698, 2004.

Download

Download paper: (link)

Copyright notice:This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. These works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To introduce a new technique for co-registration of Magnetoencephalography (MEG) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We compare the accuracy of a new bite-bar with fixed fiducials to a previous technique whereby fiducial coils were attached proximal to landmarks on the skull. METHODS: A bite-bar with fixed fiducial coils is used to determine the position of the head in the MEG co-ordinate system. Co-registration is performed by a surface-matching technique. The advantage of fixing the coils is that the co-ordinate system is not based upon arbitrary and operator dependent fiducial points that are attached to landmarks (e.g. nasion and the preauricular points), but rather on those that are permanently fixed in relation to the skull. RESULTS: As a consequence of minimizing coil movement during digitization, errors in localization of the coils are significantly reduced, as shown by a randomization test. Displacement of the bite-bar caused by removal and repositioning between MEG recordings is minimal ( approximately 0.5 mm), and dipole localization accuracy of a somatosensory mapping paradigm shows a repeatability of approximately 5 mm. The overall accuracy of the new procedure is greatly improved compared to the previous technique. CONCLUSIONS: The test-retest reliability and accuracy of target localization with the new design is superior to techniques that incorporate anatomical-based fiducial points or coils placed on the circumference of the head

Keywords

[ Brain/anatomy & histology ] [ Comparative study ] [ Data collection ] [ Equipment design ] [ Head ] [ Human ] [ *image processing ] [ Computer-assisted ] [ *magnetic resonance imaging ] [ *magnetoencephalography ] [ Monte carlo method ] [ Posture ] [ Reproducibility of results ] [ Stereotaxic techniques/*instrumentation/standards ]

Contact

P. Adjamian
G. R. Barnes
A. Hillebrand
I. E. Holliday
K. D. Singh
P. L. Furlong
E. Harrington
C. W. Barclay
P. J. Route

BibTex Reference

@article{ABH+04,
   Author = {Adjamian, P. and Barnes, G. R. and Hillebrand, A. and Holliday, I. E. and Singh, K. D. and Furlong, P. L. and Harrington, E. and Barclay, C. W. and Route, P. J.},
   Title = {Co-registration of magnetoencephalography with magnetic resonance imaging using bite-bar-based fiducials and surface-matching},
   Journal = {Clin Neurophysiol},
   Volume = {115},
   Number = {3},
   Pages = {691--698},
   Year = {2004}
}

EndNote Reference [help]

Get EndNote Reference (.ref)